I was asked to be a witness before a court to testify to the veracity of a transaction which gave right of way to the relatives of the seller of a parcel of land used as a right of way. The successors in interest (my siblings) sued them in court for alleged destruction of fence they erected in the right of way. (which they denied)
The defense of the accused was that they were given right of way. (Which we did when we bought the right of way, we gave them through a letter that they could use the ROW before such time it is donated to the LGU as required by law)
During the cross, their counselor alleged that this post was doing this to spite the siblings with whom she alleges were not in good terms with the undersigned (which was irrelevant) to the evidence being presented at hand.
This post did this because if was the truth. If we were to continue to be a businessman, and to be citizen, your word, especially the written one, must be trusted. I participated in the proceeding because I wanted the truth to come ouut